Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam Prime – Paydayloansnsi.co.uk


Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam The War In Vietnam Was Not Lost In The Field, Nor Was It Lost On The Front Pages Of The New York Times Or The College Campuses It Was Lost In Washington, DC H R McMaster From The Conclusion Dereliction Of Duty Is A Stunning Analysis Of How And Why The United States Became Involved In An All Out And Disastrous War In Southeast Asia Fully And Convincingly Researched, Based On Transcripts And Personal Accounts Of Crucial Meetings, Confrontations And Decisions, It Is The Only Book That Fully Re Creates What Happened And Why McMaster Pinpoints The Policies And Decisions That Got The United States Into The Morass And Reveals Who Made These Decisions And The Motives Behind Them, Disproving The Published Theories Of Other Historians And Excuses Of The ParticipantsA Page Turning Narrative, Dereliction Of Duty Focuses On A Fascinating Cast Of Characters President Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, General Maxwell Taylor, McGeorge Bundy And Other Top Aides Who Deliberately Deceived The Joint Chiefs Of Staff, The US Congress And The American PublicMcMasters Only Book, Dereliction Of Duty Is An Explosive And Authoritative New Look At The Controversy Concerning The United States Involvement In Vietnam



4 thoughts on “Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam

  1. Richard Kesten Richard Kesten says:

    Im innenpolitischen Machterhalt gefangene Politiker, inkompetente Beraterhorden, die hilflose Minister beraten und verstrittene und feige Spitzenmilit rs, die sich auseinander dividieren lassen oder nicht trauen, sich Geh r zu verschaffen Und fertig ist Vietnam Eine hervorragend geschriebene Analyse von einem echten Kenner der Materie Lesenswert


  2. Eduardo Eduardo says:

    The author sheds light on how weak but arrogant personalities led the USA into a futile war It is a lesson on the responsibilities that come with leadership and the importance of fact driven policies and, above all, decency.


  3. Tom Munro Tom Munro says:

    This book is one of the school in looking at the Vietnam was that America could have done things better but.Before discussing the thesis of the book lets look briefly at the war Before the 1950 s it had been easy for European Powers to conquer colonies with fairly minimal use of military power The forces used by the Dutch, the English and the French were small although well equipped and well tra


  4. Tom Munro Tom Munro says:

    This book is one of the school in looking at the Vietnam was that America could have done things better but.Before discussing the thesis of the book lets look briefly at the war Before the 1950 s it had been easy for European Powers to conquer colonies with fairly minimal use of military power The forces used by the Dutch, the English and the French were small although well equipped and well trained


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe US Now